Hi,
We have an MTO sales order against which we are raising a subcontracting PO. At the time of goods receipt, movement type 101 'E' and 543 'O' has triggered. 3 controlling entries have taken place:-
1. Cost for Goods issue to subcontractor is debited to PSG. (543 'O')
2. Credit for goods receipt from subcontractor is credited to SDI. (101 'E')
3. Service charge for subcontractor is debited to SDI.
The above entry has happened only once and is leading to excess credit on the sales order.
When we replicated the case in test environment, we found that all the costs have gone to PSG (as per OKB9). The movement types are the same as before.
We replicated a case where we triggered 543 'E' instead of 'O' and the costs are still going to PSG for all the entries. This was done by changing the 'individual/collective' indicator in material master. I believe this is the recommended SAP setting for subcontracting in MTO scenario as per following link.
Can anyone explain when does system overrule OKB9 and take sales order as cost object?
What can be the probable reason that system is behaving differently for only one occassion?
Is there any other indicator in material master that I should look for?
Can I look at OMJJ for possible causes?
I know this has been asked several times on the forums before but I have not been able to explain above situation. So thanks in advance.